In the crowded London market - 1073 hotels - this is a massive increase in a single week.
Here we examine how it was achieved...
First - they had no new negative reviews
Second - they had nineteen positive reviews (15 five star, 4 four star) and only one average (3 star) review
Third - they did better by comparison with their immediate competitors
Fourth - the average review - 4.7 - was much higher than their long-term historical average (which is 4.17).
We know that TripAdvisor disregards historical reviews (our educated guestimate is that reviews over 18 months old are no longer included in TripAdvisor's ranking algorithm - recent comment by Brian Panea of TripAdvisor indicates that this may be as short as 6-12 months; he stressed the importance of (a) volume and (b) recent reviews. So: replacing reviews with an average score of 4.17 with reviews with a higher average score means - all other influences being equal* - a higher ranking.
*The main influences on a hotel's TripAdvisor ranking fall into two categories:
Those the hotel can influence:
- The quality of their own reviews
- The volume of their own reviews
- The quality of their competitors' reviews
- The volume of their competitors' reviews
- Run a great hotel - with every effort focused on a great guest experience
- Encourage satisfied guests to post reviews to TripAdvisor
- Encourage dissatisfied guests to communicate directly - not via TripAdvisor
And this is just what the hotel in question has done with Dialogue