Tuesday 17 December 2019

The kind of Christmas present no business needs

Bear with us - this story is about review management! But first, here is a piece in the Daily Mail (and many other publications have picked it up):





So what has this got to do with reviews? Let's look at how the business looks on Google today:


Those last two reviews have been posted by people that have read about the business in the press. Up until then, the business scored a 'perfect 5'. The article is responsible for them now failing the Google filter. 

Before (filter or no filter):




After (filtered):



Gone!


Urgent action the business should take now
  1. Flag the two negative reviews.
  2. Appeal both those reviews to Google - on the grounds that the reviewers have 'no first-hand knowledge or experience of the business under review'. It's not guaranteed to work, but, framed correctly an appeal does stand a chance.
  3. Introduce a formal review management programme, designed to allow all their customers to write a review (in order to be in compliance with UK CMA regulations
  4. Then aim to get enough reviews to Google to lift their score back above the Google filter. To achieve 4.5 - the filter's cut-off - they now need another nine 5* reviews and no more 1*s. To be safe then they need the programme to keep the reviews rolling in. 
What the business - and any other business finding itself in its 'pre-press outcry' situation - looking good but with few reviews - should have done:
  1. Introduce a formal review management programme, designed to allow all their customers to write a review (in order to be in compliance with UK CMA regulations).
  2. Then aim to get enough reviews to Google to lift their score way above the Google filter. We always aim for 50 per location for our clients.
Look at this similar business - an estate agent, again in Kent - what would happen to its Google score if it received two spurious 1* reviews?





Its score would drop - perhaps - to 4.9. That would still leave it a safety margin of 0.4 clear of the Google filter. And it's highly unlikely its great rich snippets - the three shorthand guides Google provides under 'Reviews' at the bottom of the knowledge panel (above) would alter.

It would still appear in mobile/map search, irrespective of the Google filter (see that at top left in red under the Google logo?):




An added bonus? When the press looked the business up on Google at least they would see they are great servants to the home-owners of the community; it might not snuff out an article like this, but it would certainly give comfort to anyone searching for an agent in the weeks to come.


The lesson

Don't wait until your business it the victim of negative reviews before you engage. Review management should be part and parcel of every business's marketing strategy these days. it's not expensive - indeed, it should make you money (our clients generally see an uplift in call and clicks through to their websites in the region of 20 - 30 per cent) - and it will provide an excellent first line of defence in cases like these.

Tuesday 3 December 2019

London Capital & Finance - who still thinks reviews have no role to play in protecting consumers?

Continuing on our financial theme: a year ago this review of London & Capital Finance was posted to Google - and therefore visible to anyone searching online: 






We know, for certain, that at least 9 people have seen that review (see the 'thumbs up') and given that we reckon one thumb's up is equivalent to at least twenty views, the number begins to look significant). 

Meanwhile, in this week's news:





If the advice contained in that review had been followed by even one David Turnball then it must, self-evidently, be a good thing.