Friday, 15 August 2025

HelpHound for the medical profession - Google AI

We asked Google AI 'How does HelpHound help doctors with online reviews?' A simple enough question. Here is Gemini's answer (the full page first - you can replicate this search for yourself)...



Click on image to enlarge


And the text element only (for ease of reading)...



We rest our case.


Thursday, 14 August 2025

A seismic shift in the reviews landscape - CMA to use AI to examine online reviews


This post is directed at those businesses that have so far escaped sanction by the Competition and Markets Authority (the government body responsible for enforcing the law regarding online reviews in the UK). If you are a HelpHound client, you do not need to read any further, but you may like to do so to reassure yourself that your business is in full compliance with current legislation.

First, we repeat the rationale behind compliance with the CMA's regulations...

We understand why businesses cherry-pick (not so much those that 'gate*'); it's exactly why we introduced moderation: to give businesses the confidence to allow** all their customers to write a review. 


Of course, the business above could simply replace the invitation to write a review to its own website with one to write a review directly to Google, but that would mean bypassing moderation and increasing the risk of inaccurate and potentially misleading reviews finding their way to Google.


The CMA is on the case of businesses that cherry-pick happy customers to write reviews (that was confirmed to us in no uncertain terms in a conversation with a senior CMA staffer). Until now, that meant a pretty exhaustive and in-depth investigation, and businesses, particularly SMEs, quite understandably reckoned that their chances of appearing in the CMA's crosshairs were remote.

Not any more. As of this month, the CMA will be employing its own bespoke AI to track down offending businesses. 

Now, we don't know exactly how the CMA's AI will work, but if we put ourselves in the CMA enforcement team's position for a minute, we know exactly what we would be programming its AI to look for...

  • Few reviews relative to the number of customers the business has, or onboards over a given timescale 
  • An erratic pattern of reviews; many one month and then few - or none - the next
  • Sudden spikes in positive reviews - especially following a negative review
  • Use of more than one review platform. Not always an indicator, but any sign that the business is inviting reviews to one platform (Trustpilot, say) and then only inviting those that post a 5* review there to copy it to another, more visible, site (Google is the obvious choice). Called 'gating*' by the regulators and Google
  • Businesses that show only 5* reviews on their own websites
  • Businesses that show unattributed reviews on their websites
  • Businesses that are proactive in inviting customers to post reviews, but cannot prove that all their customers have had the opportunity to post a review**
  • Businesses that use mechanisms that control the timing of the review (commonly immediately post-purchase)
  • Businesses that reward customers for 5* reviews
None of the above, taken individually, are concrete proof of any contravention of the CMA rules. But they will be enough for the regulators to move on to the next step: formal investigation. This may/will involve the sequestration of computer hardware and email records. And we seriously doubt any business wants to experience that at first hand.

And the list doesn't end there. The great thing about AI is that, once programmed, it will find just about every business that fits the regulators' target criteria. All the CMA will need to do is issue sanction notices to those businesses. Exactly as HMRC did on 10 July this year, for businesses not in compliance with the Anti-Money-Laundering legislation. The onus will always be on the business to prove its innocence. And ignorance of the CMA regulations will be no defence.


And finally...

The most obvious question from businesses that have cherry-picked historically is, 'If we become compliant today, will the CMA sanction us?' We cannot give you a definitive answer to that question, although any sensible person would imagine that the CMA's priorities would lie in the direction of currently non-compliant businesses. What we can say for sure is that being able to say 'We ensured we became 100% compliant as soon as we were made aware of the relevant CMA regulations' is a far better response than 'We are currently ensuring that all our review management will be in compliance with the CMA regulations in future'.


Further reading:

Friday, 8 August 2025

HelpHound - AI and reviews - an important update

There have been two seismic shifts in the world of reviews this year...

and...
  • The CMA's warning that it is introducing AI to establish which businesses are contravening its core regulations relating to reviews (see below)


Regulation 

We asked Google's AI a simple question: 'Is there anything suspicious about [XYZ]'s reviews?' This is what it returned:




This was the very first business we asked Google's Gemini AI to interrogate - it was the first law firm 'near me' in search, so no cherry-picking for our example. You can be sure that if we can do this using proprietary AI, then the CMA's bespoke system will work even more effectively - and in numbers; this, again from a Google AI search...



What does the CMA mean by 'suspicious activity'? It is simple, really: any activity that tilts the review gathering and posting process in favour of the business (and, therefore, by definition, against the interests of the consumer). At the risk of repeating ourselves, here are the most obvious examples...
  1. Cherry-picking. Every business that invites reviews is either tempted down this road or actively does it. Why is it illegal? Because the CMA has said so! Seriously though. Take a minute to think about it; hand-picking 'happy' customers to invite to write a review must work in the business's favour.
  2. Gating. The act of pre-qualifying the above-mentioned customers. There are many mechanisms - the obvious one being an e-questionnaire. Not only against UK and EU law but expressly against Google's terms of service (risking deletion of the entirety of a business's Google reviews and red-flagging).
This issue with both of the above, post-AI, is that the regulators have gone, overnight, from relying on whistleblowers and exhaustive, time-consuming and expensive follow-up investigations to a click of a mouse and bingo! - a comprehensive list of those flouting the law, along with comprehensive proof*.

We frequently 
hear businesses dismiss regulation (and at least half the businesses we meet for the first time are in breach of one or more of the CMA's core regulations). It will either be a case of 'Why would they - in this case, the CMA - bother?' or 'If they bothered, what is the likelihood of [our business] being sanctioned?'*

But now the CMA are introducing sophisticated AI, it is time to stop 'parking on the double yellow lines.' It's not as if parking legally, in the context of reviews, is going to cost businesses either - professional review management has proved itself to be a profit centre time and again (in fact, so comprehensively that we now guarantee results or your money back).

*Again, there are those who doubt us. The key here is that a) a sanction by the CMA will not be viewed as a victimless crime by consumers, the press and social media - you can probably write the headines yourself - and b) every business in breach will have a positive treasure trove of evidence for the CMA's AI to pick up - from the reviews themselves (and the posting pattern), to the emails/texts inviting them (or not inviting them, as the case may be).


4.9 is the new 4.5

We all remember the days, not long past, when we would use a business provided it scored over 4.0. No longer. To feature in a competitive search, and to attract custom wherever it may appear in search, a business now needs three things more than ever before...

  • Great SEO
  • A Google score of 4.8 or better
  • A feed of its reviews on its own website - that, in turn, feeds through to Google searches
    In the case of the latter, the feed can be of Google reviews or its own reviews. The advantages of the latter being...
    • that the individual reviews themselves can be moderated, with factually inaccurate or potentially misleading (and damaging) reviews being resolved pre-publication anywhere (on the business's own website and/or on Google). We estimate, based on over a decade's experience and the statistics behind it, that our moderation adds between 0.2 and 0.5 to a business's overall Google score. Of course, it is not only the score that is important;  almost, sometimes more than the score, is the elimination or correction of a potentially* damaging review at the top of the business's Google feed (now almost certainly referenced by any AI search as well).
    • that the business owns its own reviews, rather than donating the data they contain exclusively to Google

    *We struck out 'potentially' as all negative reviews are damaging. The business may know that the reviewer is being unreasonable or even factually inaccurate, but the reader does not, and almost everyone searching for a high-value business will take the trouble to read any 1* reviews a business may have. Moderation is a vital safety net for any service or professional business.


    SEO


    You will have spotted the HelpHound client. But do you know where that '4.9 from 129 reviews' and its accompanying 5 gold stars come from? Most consumers will bet their last penny that they are from Google, but they are not. They are taken directly from the client's own reviews, moderated by HelpHound, and hosted on their website for all to see...






    Why host your own reviews on your own website? There are many reasons, not least of which is the marketing boost they provide. Ammunition for advertising and PR, your website, your social media and print materials. But it's not entirely accidental that HelpHound clients tend to a) score higher - by definition, a moderated system must outscore the equivalent unmoderated system, even if it only enables the business to avoid having a single inaccurrate or misleading review a year (we have clients who recieve one a month - and they are invariably resolved before publication), and b) feature more prominently in all the vital searches - local/map etc.


    Artificial Intelligence


    Our article from the day of Google's launch of Gemini AI for search

    Two here: first, the boon that AI provides for the basic day-to-day management of reviews, helping draft responses is a major one for our clients. Second: the warning from the CMA that it is going to be using sophisticated AI to identify businesses that flout its core regulations (see above). 


    Getting great reviews




    Convincing? You bet. We have purposely chosen a client in one of the most sensitive areas to show that a) people using extremely 'private' services will write reviews. If patients of a women's health clinic will write a review, albeit in less volume, so will clients of a lawyer or a financial adviser. 


    More and more evidence points to three factors that override all others;

    1. Warn the individual - face to face if at all possible - that it is now standard practice for your business to invite all its customers to write a review, and stress how helpful that is a) to other people in their position and b) for you personally
    2. Invite the review by email, not SMS. This has been shown to produce better quality reviews, consistently. Fewer 'They were great' and more of the kind you see above.
    3. Follow up with a one-minute phone call. Businesses that do so - and we have plenty of evidence of this - often convert over fifty per cent of the invitations they send out.


    Results

    These bear repetition, in the context of our fees and all of the above. Detailed numbers lifted from an industry forum (in this case estate agency) and collated by someone totally unconnected with HelpHound. Again, we repeat: these are guaranteed, and have been for over 18 months now. 


    To summarise

    • Don't wait any longer to become compliant with the CMA regulations; the CMA will not warn anyone before they act. The benefits of compliance (see 'Results' above) so far outweigh the cost, from the point of view of both time and £. And sanction by the CMA will hurt - both the fine and the attendant publicity
    • Get a compliant reviews feed embedded into your website
    • Aim to achieve a score of 4.9 for your business as soon as possible

      • Get the SEO kicker of reviews working for your business, again, as soon as possible









      Friday, 1 August 2025

      Google's Gemini AI goes live

      Remember the date. 31 July 2025. The day the world of search took a giant leap. 'A giant leap where?', you may well ask. The honest answer, in spite of all the noise, is 'Only time will tell'. And the main thing only time will tell is just how many web searches, and of what kind, will be conducted using AI going forwards (at this point we should apologise to the tech-sophisticated minority - we're going to focus on Google here, since it is currently 93 percent of the UK search market and that dominance currently shows no sign of waning).

      What has changed?

      Have you seen this yet?


      Or this?


      We know you are keen to see what happens next, so let's look at the search above in 'conventional' Google search...



      ...and now using 'AI mode'...



      What you - and therefore your potential customers - will note, pretty well straight away, is that the second - the AI search - contains far more qualitative information: Winkworth heads the first search by dint of excellent web design and SEO, plus the schema pulling through its own reviews. For the AI search, Google Gemini has scraped information from over 80 different sites (if you conduct a similar search, you will see the ticker counting as it searches) and is providing the searcher with far more information and a proper response to the 'best' query. 

      What should concern any business that hasn't got its review management house in order is that the AI search doesn't stop there...



      ...making the 'best' look even better.

      Here's a specific search for a medical practitioner...



      And here's another search, which anyone considering such treatment might be expected to make...



      This is the result of over 120 separate searches by Google Gemini - almost certainly including the clinic's Google reviews and the reviews hosted on its own website and on HelpHound servers.


      No need to highlight any of this as it is all relevant!


      Conclusion

      All the while Google allows people to opt in/out of Gemini, there will be some that stay with conventional 'ten blue link' search (although that is also headed by AI results), but then we remember people saying that Ask Jeeves was here to stay. There is no doubt that 'long string searches' for high-value services will gravitate towards AI; the only question is 'How long will it take?'


      Last of all - but very important

      Regular readers will know we never relent when it comes to compliance with the CMA regulations. But we also know that many reading this article will be content to continue to flout those regulations (which have the force of law), the key rules being those prohibiting cherry-picking (businesses must allow all of their customers, clients or patients to write a review if they invite any to do so) and gating (pre-qualifying customer opinions before inviting selected customers to write a review. 

      Until now, we would probably have agreed that the risk of sanction was pretty low - even despite this conversation with the CMA - but no longer. The CMA is introducing AI, with special reference to online reviews...




      ...AI will identify, in seconds, businesses that flout the CMA regulations by looking for patterns of review writing and the content of the reviews themselves. To take one obvious example: a business looks great on a review site but far less good on Google. Another: the ratio of reviews to customers - the business conducts dozens of transactions but gets few reviews. 



      The key is to look at the opportunity cost of compliance: a compliant business - and all HelpHound client businesses are compliant by definition of having the 'Write a review' button on their websites - can relax in the knowledge that their reviews are bullet-proof: from criticism by competitors ('they only have great reviews because they cherry-pick') and the CMA. Our clients don't pay for our review management because they have cash to spare, they do so because they know that our professional review management feeds straight through to the bottom line - guaranteed.




      Monday, 21 July 2025

      HelpHound - it's not 'either/or'

      When a business first encounters HelpHound - through our website or this blog, or as a result of a recommendation from another of our clients, there can be an understandable preconception: that it is 'HelpHound's way or the highway'. Nothing could be further from the truth, and in this article we will set out the options for your business as well as dispelling any notion that HelpHound is a one-size-fits-all solution.

      Your objectives are our objectives

      What does your business aim to achieve with reviews, besides the universal objective of 'more enquiries/more conversions'? There is a very good reason that HelpHound does not offer an online signup: we need to know precisely what kind of review management will benefit your business best...

      • Google reviews
      • Moderated Google reviews 
      • Reviews on an external website - Trustpilot, Feefo etc.
      • A combination of two or more of the above
      • Reviews showing on your website
      • Reviews feeding through to your socials
      • Reviews supporting PR, advertising and other marketing
      • Ownership of your own reviews
      We will also ensure, whatever solutions we recommend, that your business is in compliance with the law (enforced by the Competition and Markets Authority in the UK) and Google's own Terms of Service (applicable worldwide), the core rules of which are...


      • no cherry-picking (if a business invites any reviews, it must allow all of its customers to write one)
      • no gating (gating includes such tactics as sending out a questionnaire and then only asking those who respond positively to write a review)
      An online reputation built on either of these is built on sand; and, furthermore, unnecessary. With moderation - reviews being checked for factual accuracy pre-publication - businesses can build rock-solid online reputations without flouting the law (our clients also tell us that it helps them sleep at night!).

      Our No. 1 objective on behalf of all our clients is to ensure that the review management strategy we recommend is fully compliant with both UK law and Google's Terms of Service.



      In the case of products, a review site's star rating can be a helpful marketing tool, but we might argue that 5 glowing gold stars from Google is an even more powerful - and credible - way to drive customers through your door

      Next: where are your potential customers looking? If the answer is 'billboards' or 'on the London Underground', then a reviews site may be the right avenue (or at least part of the solution); if the answer is 'through a web search [of any kind]', then the answer will almost certainly be Google.




      You can spot the HelpHound client easily, not just because they head up local search (having your own reviews provides a great SEO kicker) but because we ensure their own reviews are pulled through by Google - see the red arrow (no, they're the business's own reviews, not, as many are convinced, Google reviews or Google stars; just look at them on the business's website). Many clients say those stars pay for their HelpHound membership on their own!


      Professional services need to look increasingly as near-perfect on Google as they can. Five years ago, scoring 4.5 out of 5 meant leading either their category and/or local search; today, that score needs to be at least 4.8 or 4.9, and maintained at that level. The only way of being sure of achieving that is...
      • to be really good at what you do
      • to have great CRM
      • to employ a moderated review management system

      The last of these - a moderated review management system - will help enormously where the first two are concerned: it will provide an ongoing stream of feedback to the business so improvements can be made and those, in turn, will result in improvements to customer relationship management.




      Every client that has posted a review on the business's website is automatically asked to copy it to Google. Out of the 743 posted here over 500 have done so

      So: speak to us - or contact us at info@helphound.com - and we will answer all your questions. 


      Further reading

      • Moderation - the key to successful review management
      • Compliance - to be credible, reviews must be acquired in compliance with the law and Google's Terms of Service


      Wednesday, 16 July 2025

      Nature - and the public's thirst for reviews - abhors a vacuum


      Who benefits? Parents? Pupils? The school? Read on. The answer may surprise you.

      Earlier this year, for reasons a tad unclear - we cannot believe that one plea from a schoolteacher in the Northwest of England and some of their colleagues moved Google all on its own - Google removed the ability for users to write reviews of schools.

      The initial reaction from schools and the educational press was positive; after all, who likes to read the kind of reviews schools were receiving as a result of their failure to engage with Google reviews? 'Nonsense written by silly year 9s' was the general consensus.

      We were surprised that we were just about the only voice in the wilderness shouting 'But Google reviews, properly mobilised and managed, are one of the most powerful tools there is when it comes to  communicating a school's strengths.'  Here's the piece we wrote then.

      We also warned that schools would live to regret the passing of Google reviews. 

      So - now, less than six months later - what do we see? Two distinct things...

      1.  Schools being forced to resort to paid-for Google Ads if they wish to feature consistently in Google local searches...



      We know! 'Sponsored' is a strange word to use for 'We are charging this school £X per click to appear at the top of this search,' but that is exactly what this is.


      2.  The likes of this website fulfilling the need...





      The quality of the reviews - if the score is anything to go by - has not improved!


      To reiterate our position: Google should allow reviews of schools. If not schools, why doctors or lawyers? Where do you draw the line? Schools have a responsibility to all their stakeholders, especially future parents and pupils, to proactively engage with those stakeholders to ensure their school or college is accurately reflected in those reviews. That way everyone benefits: parents don't have to pay to 'unlock' reviews and schools don't have to pay to rank in Google searches. Everyone benefits, with the possible exception of Google and websites such as the one above, but we're not here to shed a tear on Google's behalf!

      Please feel free to comment - below - on this incredibly important subject.






      Wednesday, 28 May 2025

      Partnering with HelpHound

      Most B2B businesses will tell you - publicly or privately - that many (most?) of their best customers come thanks to referrals from their business contacts*. So if you run a business, current client of HelpHound or not - please read on.

      *business contacts: we don't expect referrals from direct competitors, obviously, but most of our successful referrals come from either businesses in the same line of work but in a different geographical area or the referring business's professional advisors, including marketing, advertising and PR agencies.




      Going from Zero to Hero as these two businesses have done (the one on the left had two reviews on joining HelpHound, the one on the right none at all, showing great faith!) is not the only reason a business joins HelpHound. Others include compliance - it comes as a surprise to some that it is illegal to hand-pick customers to invite to write reviews in the UK - and SEO (a good flow of reviews through your own site boosts that considerably), to star ratings in local search (very highly valued by most of our clients)



      This screenshot shows precisely what HelpHound aims to achieve for all our clients - leading in map and organic search, with a great score from a convincing number of reviews, as well as the 'stars in search' derived from the business's own reviews under its organic listing (many people think those stars in search are 'awarded' by Google, when they are drawn - by Google - from the reviews hosted on the business's own website



      Criteria for partnership

      The key to recommending a business is that there should be no, or at the very least minimal**, downside for the referring or the referred business. 

      **While HelpHound provides the best review management available globally (that we are aware of), we cannot, and should not, make promises regarding the elimination of negative reviews. UK law currently - and rightly - prohibits such activity anyway, and there will always be the tiny minority of consumers who are determined to wilfully misunderstand what a business has done for them. We have operated in this 'real world' for well over a decade now, and our own statistics show that over 97 per cent of erroneous reviews are addressed before they ever reach the public web.

      Let us put this in the context of HelpHound, first for the referred business...

        • HelpHound is demonstrably the best at what it does - it achieves better outturns, in terms of improved Google scores, flow of reviews and quality of reviews, than any other operator in the review management sector - provably
        • Everything HelpHound does - and everything HelpHound advises its clients to do - is in compliance with UK (and EU) law
        • Every review that flows through HelpHound is moderated for...
          • intelligible English, both spelling and grammar 
          • factual accuracy 
          • potentially misleading comments
      And all of this enables HelpHound to...    

        • Guarantee success - positively and unequivocally, from day 1 - and no single client has yet invoked that guarantee. The businesses you refer will...
          • look better in terms of Google score - 4.9*** is our aim
          • increase their flow of reviews to Google
          • have a positive flow of reviews to their own website - massively enhancing social proof, click-through and SEO
          • enjoy 'stars in search' - see above
          • be compliant with the CMA regulations

      ***very occasionally, we need to advise a business to modify its CRM before embarking on review management. Our moderation is designed to eliminate, as far as the regulations allow, factually inaccurate, potentially misleading and sometimes just plain unfair reviews. It is not, and never should be, seen as a mechanism for a business whose CRM is deficient to deflect fairly held negative opinions. 

      So: your valuable business contacts will be safe in our hands. No comebacks and definitely no backlash. Our aim is for them to all feel eternally grateful that you introduced us, day in day out, year in year out, from day one.


      Now, for you - our partner (and the referring business)...

      We are completely open in terms of remuneration: our referring businesses receive...
        • 25% of any initial charges we make to the referred business 
        • 25% of the first annual charges we make to the referred business
        • 10% of any subsequent fees charged - for the lifetime of the referral (our first referrer is currently approaching year 10 of such fees)
      An example of a single-location business: fees paid to the referring business:

      Total fees paid to referrer in year 1 =         £ 1,171

      In subsequent years =                               £  735

      Referring one business a month - fees at the end year 1 = £14,052



      The kind of business that benefits most from HelpHound's service...

      It might help if we turn that question on its head: what kind of business benefits least?
      • online retailers: if all the business needs are star ratings for the products it sells, there are far better alternatives
      • monopolies: unless they really care about their customers - and by 'really care' we mean that they respond to every one of their Google reviews in a timely manner, then it's a 'no' for them as well
      So it's service and professional businesses, those that seriously rely on their reputations, both in the wider community and online, in order to thrive...
      • legal
      • medical
      • financial
      ...and related businesses: accountancy, recruitment, estate agency and so on (not to mention businesses in marketing, PR and advertising!). And subsets of these businesses, depending on their current presence online...

      • Businesses with few Google reviews
      • Businesses that have flouted the law to get Google reviews (it's surprising how many do - usually unwittingly)
      • Businesses that have been 'sold' a review website
      • Businesses that have been 'sold' reputation management 
      and most of all...
      • Businesses that have not yet found a safe way to engage with reviews


      Now for the $64,000 question

      Can HelpHound reassure us, the referring business, that the businesses we refer will benefit, at the bare minimum, by the fees they will be charged? In other words: can you be sure that HelpHound membership will be profitable for them?

      The simple answer is 'If we analyse the business referred and consider that we cannot add value by at least the amount charged, we will advise both you and the referred business.'  

      But let us add some numbers - here is a separate article focused on concrete results - and since it refers to an estate agency, let us extrapolate that in terms of hard cash. With an average house price in London of £700,000, and an agency fee of 1.5%, that equates to a fee of £10,500. So one extra transaction a year earns this particular business more than two and a half times HelpHound's initial fee and well over three times our fee from year two onwards. 

      An extra reassurance is that we are fully aware that should HelpHound not add value for the referred business, the referrer will soon know, and we will have put the continued flow of referrals at risk. We are here to ensure 100% win/win for all parties.


      Our suggestion

      You select a single business with which you have built up a trusted relationship. Talk to them and highlight the fact that you have found the following...
      1. A safe and secure way to guarantee a steady flow of great reviews - to their own website (SEO and social proof) and Google (score and stars in search)
      2. That is guaranteed to work
      And then simply send them an email copied to us - info@helphound.com

      We will do the rest. We look forward to making the first bank transfer!

      Monday, 19 May 2025

      Reviews for sensitive and complex businesses - a deep dive

      First, let us define what we mean by a 'sensitive' business, or rather let this potential client define it for us...

      "If you are going to ask us to invite all of our customers to write a review, then the answer has to be a definite 'No'. It would be far too high-risk a strategy for a business like ours."

      And they would be quite right. Businesses such as those providing professional services such as financial, healthcare, legal and the like, can be extremely complex, and as a result aspects can be easily misconstrued. This can lead to misunderstandings that are bound to be perpetuated in reviews. And such reviews can seriously harm a business. The following is just one example (albeit with an extreme outcome)...



      If you have any doubts about this, please read the full story of the firm of solicitors that were being so seriously (and quantifiably) damaged by this single ill-founded negative review that they took the reviewer to court (and won damages - 'won', when you read the full sorry tale, is not really the right word for what happened subsequently).

      Fears, well-founded as they are, quite understandably lead businesses in the sensitive and complex sectors mentioned above to either...

      • avoid engaging with reviews altogether or...
      • flout the law - the CMA regulations - and cherry-pick customers they know for certain will write a 5* review
      So what, exactly, is HelpHound's role in this apparently unresolvable conundrum? Between 'going for it' and risking your business's reputation* in the quest for a great Google score and all the business you know such a glowing image in search can drive through your door and 'burying your head' and missing out on that gold rush? Read on.

      *'risking your reputation': the CMA has sharp teeth - and is on the case of businesses flouting their regulations - but far more likely is a business noticing that a competitor is cherry-picking and using that fact against it to win business.

      Lifting the bonnet 

      We have a deep understanding of the above-mentioned CMA regulations, as you might expect from a business that has been intimately involved with all aspects of online reviews - Google and otherwise - for well over a decade now. 

      The two golden keys to effective review management, especially for sensitive businesses, are firstly: to understand the fundamental difference between...
      • inviting all of your customers to write a review and... 
      • ...allowing all of your customers to write a review
      The former would be fine in an ideal world, where every consumer understood precisely what every business was attempting to achieve for them and exactly how.

      Fortunately, the regulators recognise that this ideal world does not exist in reality, which is why the second of the above - enabling all of your customers to write a review - applies, in the UK at least.


      ...and the second of these golden keys?...
      • moderation - the act of employing an independent body to mediate with customers who may write a factually inaccurate or potentially misleading review, pre-publication
      Combine this seemingly innocuous button on the business's website...



      ...with what happens immediately after anyone posts a review...
      1. The review arrives in HelpHound's internal inbox
      2. The review is read by a HelpHound moderator
      3. Basic errors of spelling and grammar are corrected (these radically devalue otherwise great reviews)
      4. If our moderator suspects the review contains any errors of fact or potentially misleading statements, they immediately engage, privately, with the reviewer and, if necessary, the business
      5. The corrected review* is then published on the business's own website
      6. The reviewer is then asked to copy their review to Google 
      *In over 97 per cent of cases, the reviewer either corrects their review or asks for it to be deleted altogether. To be in compliance with the CMA regulations, it is essential that customers are allowed to post whatever review they wish - providing, of course, that it does not contravene UK laws of libel, for instance.

      There you have it:  the most watertight review management service on the planet. Your business can confidently go about asking for reviews from selected customers, safe in the knowledge that it is compliant with the law and safe from misinformed, as well as simply plain unfair reviews.


      One final point: we guarantee results - see here. But we obviously cannot guarantee that no negative reviews will ever appear, for one of two reasons:
      • Businesses do make mistakes: in that case, it is always our advice to apologise and move on, whilst pointing out that mistakes, as evidenced by the business's overwhelmingly positive reviews, are extremely rare occurrences and confirming what restitution is being made (for the benefit of those reading the review)


      When this client joined it had 2 Google reviews and none on its own website. As you can see, it now has over 500 Google reviews (and well over 700 on its own website); during that time it has averaged one 1* review a year. A typical outturn for a well-managed business.

      • Occasionally, a customer will bypass whatever systems you put in place, but in these rare instances a HelpHound client will always have the moral high ground; they are able to say, in their written response to the negative review, that the customer always had the opportunity to write a review by visiting the company's website - and, again, they are able to reference the business's positive reviews

      Conclusion

      The process we describe above has been tested and refined over fourteen years. It works. It has enabled businesses in extremely sensitive areas to thrive, attracting enquiries from the web in volume. Not all of these clients have been able to amass hundreds of reviews, such is their sensitivity. Here is one final example...




      No - nil - Google reviews when this business joined


      We would encourage you to google the Harper Clinic - a women's health clinic in Harley Street - and read some of their reviews. If they can amass nearly 50 reviews, in compliance with the law, from women seeking such an intensely private service, just imagine what HelpHound can do for your business, however 'sensitive and complex' it may be?


      Further reading

      We hope this article has covered everything you need to know to take the first step towards putting your business's review management on a secure professional footing. The following articles explain everything in even more detail, but by far the best 'next step' is to speak/meet with us so we can answer all your questions in precise relation to your own business.



      Friday, 16 May 2025

      Google reviews - eliminating the risk

      Despite what their marketing may say - the review sites now play second fiddle to Google, big time. Google dominates...

      • in search
      • in visibility
      • in credibility
      • in its power to drive business towards those businesses that look great in search 
      The only problem, from a business's point-of-view, is that it cannot control what its customers will say when they come to write their review. 'Quite right, that's where Google's credibility comes from' we hear some of the more savvy of our readers say. And they are quite right. And that's where HelpHound comes in.


      Eliminating the risk inherent in inviting Google reviews: Step 1

      90 per cent of reviews are fine. They are positive - 4 or 5 stars - and they don't contain factual inaccuracies or misleading statements likely to either mislead another potential customer or do damage to the business. But the one in ten? Ouch! 

      90 per cent would be a great pass mark in any exam, but in the world of reviews it's a definite fail. If one in ten of a business's reviews rate it - unfairly - at 1 out of 5, then it is going to suffer... 
      • when compared to its competitors
      • when potential clients click on 'lowest' and read many of those ' 1 in 10' reviews
      Any business that wants reviews to work for it will need to be scoring 4.8 at a minimum and preferably 4.9. To put that into numbers: the business needs 49 out of 50 of its reviews to score it 5 stars. A few months ago we published '4.9 is the new 4.5' and we were deadly serious. In 2020 a Google score of 4.5 would cut the mustard. No longer.


      For readers who have a 'perfect business'

      We hear you. And we know businesses just like yours. You have highly effective management, wonderful staff and checks and balances in place to ensure your clients/patients/investors are always completely happy with whatever service you provide for them.

      But every time we meet such a business we ask one simple question: 'Are all your customers perfect?' And that question always - invariably - elicits the answer 'Most. But - turning to a colleague - what about Mrs X and Mr Y, and a few others. I wouldn't want any of them writing a review of our service.'

      That's where HelpHound comes in. By law, in the UK, you cannot allow all your customers except the 'Mrs X and Mr Ys' to write a review. You must - again we stress: by law - allow all of your customers to write a review.

      By now you will be seeing where we are headed - after all we have nearly 15 years doing nothing but this - the key word here is 'allow'. Look at this screenshot of a client's mobile website...





      It contains all you need to collect reviews safely (for the business and the consumer - very few people really want an inaccurate or misleading review published for all to see) and in compliance with UK law:

        1. The 'Write a Review' button does what it says: it allows anyone to simply click and write a review - to the business's own website. This ensures compliance with the CMA regulations and allows our moderators and the business to interact with any reviews (and their authors) that may contain factual inaccuracies or potentially misleading comments before the reviewer is asked to post their review to Google.
        2. Any prospective customer can click on the number of reviews - or the 'more' button - to read as many of them as they wish.
        3. See the number of reviews? 710. For a single branch of an estate agency. And the score? The vital 4.9.

      Eliminating the risk inherent in inviting Google reviews: Step 2

      Now, you're asking: 'What about Google'? We are delighted to show you...




      When they joined HelpHound? 2 Google reviews. Everyone who writes a review to the business's website is automatically asked to copy their review - after it has been moderated - to Google


      We advise most businesses, at least initially, to invite reviews to their own website in the first instance. This allows our moderators to perform their essential function - challenging those inaccurate and potentially misleading reviews and reviewers pre-publication (there's a full description of the process here). A typical benchmark might be 100 Google reviews before we advise the business to implement what we call our 'Multi' invitation - asking the customer to write both a review to the business's website and to Google at the same time.


      So - what do we have here?

      We have the only safe and secure method for businesses to absolutely minimise the risk inherent in engaging with reviews. No ifs, not buts. Guaranteed. Speak to us and we'll tell you exactly what your own business can expect.